Godman or Conman, by Basava Premanand, attacked by Gerald Moreno

UNFOUNDED, MISLEADING CLAIMS AGAINST MY WRITINGS - part three
by Basava Premanand

Reply to Gerald Moreno's claims from
http://www.saisathyasai.com/baba/Ex-Baba.com/

THE THIRD CRITICISM is under "ExBaba.com: Deception" also in the page
Comments by Gerald Moreno - On Basava Premanand, honored by the Indian Government, where he refers to the ExBaba page 'Godman or Conman'?'

Gerald Moreno's comments appear in bold black face and mine in regular case navy blue type.

Reply to Gerald Moreno's claims from
http://www.saisathyasai.com/baba/Ex-Baba.com/

GM : An article re-hashing the same points over and over. This article talks about Basava Premanand, who is well known for spreading lies and conspiracy theories against Sathya Sai Baba. B.Premanand also repeats the lie that, "Sathya Sai Baba was the only key witness to the events that night? Premanand does not know this. He is speculating as can be seen on my article about Basava Premanand's conspiracy theory about the murders of 1993.

Reply: Gerald Moreno very well knows that I am not the author of the article in question, he is an adept in faking even published newspaper articles fully knowing that the people who read his articles in the Deception series will not probe deeper as they are taught to believe everything Sathya Sai Baba and people like he tells them. He states that B.Premanand repeats the lies that, "Sathya Sai Baba was only key witness to the events that night".

How he reads this from the article 'Sai Baba : God-man or Con-man?' is known only to him. What is stated by Miss Tanya Datta is: "He was outraged that Sai Baba - one of the key witnesses to the events of that night - had not been questioned ".
In GM's eyes "one of the key witnesses" got changed to "was the only key witness". He seems to be so sure that all Pro Sathya Sai Baba followers accept things without verification just like he does.

His conspiracy theory on the murders of 1993 has already been refuted by me with proof.

It is surprising that GM had nothing to state about other matters published in the article except to fraudulently change the word "one of the key witnesses" to "was the only key witness"! His attempts at deception are futile, though crafty!
I challenge Gerald Moreno to prove other matters in the article are false. I know for sure that he will fail even to refute one paragraph honestly.

Go to part one - part two - part four - part five

or RETURN TO HOME PAGE - CLICK HERE -

NOTE! Unless otherwise stated, every article on these pages is the registered copyright of the author and/or website owner and unauthorised copying will be pursued legally .
Permission to be sought in writing via the owner of this website