When Sathya Sai Baba died in April 2011, The Telegraph posted two different obituaries on him - one was by Gethin Chamberlain originally posted here (if removed, see http://www.saibaba-x.org.uk/15/The%20Telegraph-obit.jpg)

and another one by the editorial board here, which received a large number of comments. here (http://www.saibaba-x.org.uk/15/telegraphSB-obit.html)

The comments made by the former devotee, Hans de Kraker, are the most illumin ing and also damning of Sai Baba, because de Kraker testified in a formal affidavit that he had been abused by Sai Baba and, moreover, he most firmly rebutted the assertion made against him (by O.P. Sudrania) that he was not present during the murders the night of June 6th, 1993. (see later on in the exchanges of comments).

Comment by Robert Priddy:

This did not put Dr. O.P. Sudrania, apologist for Sai Baba, on Hans de Kraker's side, oh no! He even showed he had not studied anything about the sex abuses because he held that he was told (?) that there were 'only two' males abused, which it absolutely false. Thirty young men had writtentheir sworn testimonies, and these represent the tip of the iceberg of foreign young men.

Meanwhile students - who we know from Dr. Bhatia's testimony to The Telegraph's Mick Brown - were abused on a large scale,
up to six per day (and Bhatia himself told that he had regular sexual
relations with Sai Baba). Also David Bailey knew personally a number of Sai Baba college students who were being sexually abused and who approached Bailey (their trusted music teacher and favourite devotee of Sai Baba at the time) to tell him this and ask his help in the matter, which he certainly gave!