Part One - Part Two - Part Four
The foes of the 'open society' (Sir Karl
Popper's term) are those who use its very openness to achieve their
closed and devious ends. Sai Baba and his highly authoritarian and
cultist organisation have such ends, which critics have tried to make
known. Its foremost leaders silence all those who question it- and never
face substantive criticisms. For the first time - after six years of
pained and guilty silence - since hundreds of long-term devotees left it
in disgust - the Sathya Sai Organisation has found it necessary to try
to defuse the debate about Sathya Sai Baba's alleged crimes, deceits and
fraudulence. Dr. Venkataraman's tendentious cover-up article expresses
untruths which have long circulated within the cult, giving an
opportunity to confront him with facts and truth, as follows:-
Comments by the undersigned are in navy blue text:
This page uses footnotes, please take notice how these footnotes work: 1) The footnotes are active links to documentation, by clicking on anyone you will be led to completing info about the subject you were reading, just click on Back in your browser to return to the footnotes.2) By clicking the digit before each footnote you will return to the text above exactly where you were stopped reading.
THE INEVITABLE COLLAPSE OF CALUMNY
[by Dr. G. Venkataraman]
[Venkataraman's text in black from http://media.radiosai.org/Journals/Vol_04/01JUL06/collapse-of-calumny.htm
Radio Sai Listener's journal: Volume 4 - Issue 07 JULY 2006]
Things went into a different gear altogether when the BBC came out with an anti-Swami film. This was absolutely shocking because like the London Times, the BBC is an icon - in the broadcasting world that is. And yet, for reasons best known to it, the BBC produced a program that was not only poorly researched but also deplorably low in taste, quite in contrast to what it is known for.
Comment: As Venkatarman would have it, in the face of thousands of programs that maintain the BBC as an “icon”, suddenly it deviates and becomes “absolutely shocking”. Autocratic and corrupt regimes and organisations with much to hide invariably complain like this when the BBC exposes them after exhaustive research!The Sad Case of Alaya Rahm
Central to BBC’s vilification campaign was one Alaya Rahm.I do not know what you think about it, but as far as I am concerned,
this case withdrawal by Alaya Rahm, before the suit came up for formal
hearing before a Judge, knocks the bottom out of all the allegations
that have been circulated during the last several years.
Comment: Not one accuser, out of scores around the world, has withdrawn
his allegations. Read the statement by the
International JuST Group, the Rahm Family and the family’s lawyer.
And please remember that Rahm would not have dismissed his own case, if he thought he had a chance of winning. The fact is he had no case, none at all, at any time. For years, Alaya Rahm got away with wild allegations, and the BBC made much of it. Why? Because they were never put to the legal test.
Comment: Nor was Alaya Rahm’s case put to the legal test. For reasons former devotee lawyers in the USA and elsewhere are having trouble in understanding, Rahm’s attorney embarked on the case only to discover that there was no legally incorporated entity to sue.Kreydick's main point is that Alaya never mentioned the abuses to him. In the television documentaries, Alaya stated that he believed, at the time of the abuses, that if he spoke about them his family would reject him. Lewis Kreydick’s deposition is that of a blindly subjective devotee who attempted to slur Alaya Rahm. Kreydick claimed that he was a close friend and advisor to Alaya and made constant speculations about Alaya's state of mind (repeatedly objected to by Rahm’s attorney), claiming he could not have been abused and unhappy because he was all smiles. The attempt was to sully Alaya’s character (and, disgracefully, that of his mother, too!). This was heartless. Kreydick’s testimony totally disregarded the situation that Alaya was going through a tremendous inner upheaval while having to put up a brave face. Experts in sexual abuse attest that abusees, in the face of a situation too painful to admit fully into consciousness, can hide the turmoil about a situation beneath smiles. Here was an individual, knowing the terrible consequences in a US court should anyone perjure themselves, striving to tell his story of a very confusing and traumatic sexual abuse by his former guru, whom he had been raised to regard as God.signed Barry Pittard and Robert
Priddy
Note: Several paragraphs from Venkataraman’s
article were omitted in the above since they required no comment.
Footnotes:
active links to documentation, (click on any
one):
20)
The Case of the ‘Missing’ Media Advisory and deception by Sai
authorities and their political cronies
21)
Some prominent
ex-devotees and former leaders in the Sai Organisation
22)
Scans of the xeroxed and signed ‘Hislop letters’
EXTRA SOURCES:
BBC’s
webpage on Basava Premanand’s claims against Sai Baba
George Orwell’s 1984
Unresolved,
quashed investigation of murders in Sai Baba's bedroom, 1993
See The
International Sai Petition -
and View ex-follower signatures